• December 1, 2021

Debunking The Most Common Property Restoration Myths

There are many misconceptions regarding the reduction and restoration of property damage. These concepts may have been accurate in the past when the technology wasn’t as complex. However, professional restoration businesses see beyond those fallacies and use the ideal course of action to mitigate the damages. If a property owner doesn’t act quickly enough or doesn’t take the right action because of these misconceptions, they may end up with even more damage to deal with, which could have easily been avoided.  Here are the five common land restoration myths and the truth behind them.

Myth #1: Fixing costs less than restoring

In most cases, cleaning and salvaging the materials and construction is actually less expensive than replacing them. This can vary with the circumstances. Sometimes, replacement is the only option. For instance, if after a fire, smoke soot hasn’t been properly cleaned out of all surfaces, the damaged contents must be substituted. Yet trained restoration company ought to be in a position to successfully clean and remove contaminates, avoiding high replacement costs.

Moreover, a professional recovery technician will constantly prioritize mitigation. Mitigation is extremely time-critical since it stops further harm and reduces further loss. It usually needs to be carried out within 24 hours of the disaster. Any delay will further complicate or devalue the mitigation effort.

Myth #2: If you clean your carpets, they will get dirty faster

This was true in the past when the techniques, equipment, and materials were so inferior. Inefficient carpet shampooing left a soap residue that brought dirt faster than before cleanup. Nowadays, the carpet cleaning process both flushes and rinses carpeting, preventing that from occurring.

Myth #3: Drying a home is full when the carpets are dry

This misconception is far from the truth because the carpets dry much quicker than structural substances. Thus, the drying process is complete only when all of the structural items, such as cement flooring and walls, are totally dry. To measure moisture levels, professionals use advanced meters and sensors. That’s extremely important to accomplish the result — a totally ironic structure. The danger with ineffective drying is it can turn a little loss from water damage to some multi-thousand dollar mold case.

Myth #4: A fire-damaged home will always smell like smoke, so cleaning it fast is unnecessary

Stories arise about smoke damage restoration attempts which have failed, usually because odor remains. Though smoke soot is far more harmful than normal dust or dirt, prompt cleaning can reduce losses in the event the soot is neutralized. Consequently, if you do not clean the smoke residue immediately following a fire, then the valuables inside your house may suffer irreversible harm, due to the acidic nature of the smoke particles.

Odor removal is more complicated than turning to a machine and hoping to attain fantastic results. Restoration for smoke odor needs to be thorough. All contaminated areas need to be cleaned, deodorized, and sealed where applicable.

Myth #5: DIY is much cheaper than hiring a recovery firm

This holds in some instances, but you need to be exceedingly cautious. A botched fix can cost you more in the long run. Therefore,  damage restoration services can help you save extra expenses. Find out more about the benefits of hiring a professional and the risks of DIY mold removal.

For property damage recovery, call the professionals!

Do not fall for the property restoration myths! When in doubt, always consult a trained professional restoration firm, such as PuroClean. Professionals are the best assurance when it comes to reduction and recovery. Their continuous technical training helps them avoid the faulty theories and errors of yesteryear. Using the latest equipment and techniques, they are certain that the job is completed correctly and thoroughly — the first moment. Telephone your regional PuroClean office now! Click here for more information.